you're reading...
African Cinema, Film Reviews

Bamako (Mali/France 2006)

Africa speaks out against the IMF and the World Bank in Bamako

You don’t get many films like this on release from a mainstream (albeit ‘independent’) distributor like Artificial Eye these days. This came out in the UK in 2007, but possibly only on one print. The print we showed in Bradford had bad scratches down the centre of the image for the first few minutes. Audience members I spoke to afterwards were overwhelmed by the tirade of ideas that came flying at them and some said how it was a shock to see a film that really made you think.

Writer-director Abderrahmane Sissako was born in Mauretania, brought up in Mali and trained as a filmmaker in the Soviet Union during the 1980s. These days he lives in France (I think) and travels back to Africa to make films. He has a healthy scepticism about the politics and lifestyle of Europeans and Americans and in this film goes for the jugular with a well-argued case against the G8 nations who pretend to cancel African debts but in practice, via the World Bank and the IMF, continue to bleed Africa so that the poorest continent pays back more than it ever ‘borrowed’. In fact, as one speaker suggests, it is Africa’s riches which attract the North and it is because they have been stolen that Africa is poor. Sissako also condemns the Africans who aid the North in this plunder.

Anyone who claims that they don’t like to be “preached at” will probably not last more than a few minutes into the film. That’s a shame, but those who are more open to ideas will learn a great deal (and enjoy a film which is rich in meanings beautifully presented). Sissako’s strategy has three prongs – the action is set primarily in the courtyard of a house in one of the poorer districts of the Malian capital, Bamako. In fact, this is the house where Sissako grew up and where up to 25 members of his family and associates have lived at any one time. In this courtyard he stages the trial of the IMF and the World Bank, who are accused from the dock by an array of African writers, academics and ordinary people. The court is conducted by real-life advocates – in French (spoken clearly at a pace that even I can understand, in parts). Some of the Africans speak in local languages. This play on language use is part of the political strategy of the film. There are Africans fluent in cogent argument in French legal language and Africans representing local issues. While the court hearings are taking place, life in the compound goes on as usual.

A couple live in the house and the woman goes off to sing in a cabaret. Her unemployed husband stays home attempting to learn Hebrew so that if an Israeli Embassy ever arrives in this Muslim country, he will have an advantage applying for the post of security guard! Their marriage is falling apart and the husband even tries evangelical Christianity as some form of succour. Outside the gate local women are dyeing cloth (an activity which also spills over into the courtyard) and there are other narratives too, with a policeman looking for a missing gun and a video cameraman touting for business as well as a man who is seriously ill, requiring drips and proper medical aid. Most of these characters ignore the trial – the young men outside the compound disconnect the tannoy relaying the court proceedings.  The third aspect of the presentation is a spoof spaghetti western seemingly appearing on television one night during the trial. ‘Death in Timbuktu’ features a group of bandits (including the director under a pseudonym and the Palestinian director Elia Suleiman) and a ‘man with no name’ character played by Danny Glover. Sissako, like many African youths in the 1970s watched cheap action pictures from France and Italy (and probably Hollywood and Hong Kong). By creating this spoof, he is referring to the Africans who have conspired to kill and starve their own people.

Sissako is an interesting director with his Russian training and an obvious knowledge of African and European cinema. I was reminded of two or three other filmmakers from different traditions in watching a film that is always full of surprises – including several jokes. My favourite moment was when, outside the compound, a woman is being literally sown into her constricting, corset-like, wedding dress (French style white) while over the tannoy a witness argues that economically the North is “crushing the Negro” (his language perhaps consciously referring to the ‘Négritude’ movement with Aimé Césaire being namechecked). At the end of the film, the white wedding dress is recalled with a second image of older women in white mourning clothes for a funeral. I can see references to Sembène Ousmane in some of the characterisation and depictions of local culture. The approach also seems to draw on the work of fellow Mauritanian/Malian/French director Med Hondo as well as the political films of Jean-Luc Godard. The spaghetti western scene reminded me of Vent d’est (1969) in which Godard uses the western to explore the machinery of cinema and the slugfest between Hollywood and what he calls ‘Mosfilm’ as seen by the Maoist Dziga-Vertov Group. Sissako’s film is far too conventional and subtle to count as ‘counter cinema’ in the Godardian sense, but it still makes audiences think. I’m going to go back and check out some of the other allusions I think I missed the first time round.

Discussion

6 thoughts on “Bamako (Mali/France 2006)

  1. Bamako is very watchable (beautiful graphic cinematography, and some very strong performances) but his 2002 film ‘Waiting for Happiness’ is a more rewarding film in my view: slow, poetic and humane, it addresses issues of globalisation, poverty and deracination. Like Bamako it uses subtle allusions, puzzles and clues to tell its story.

    Posted by Tom Barrance | May 4, 2010, 18:56
    • I have to agree – I’d like to listen to the Chinese hawker sing karaoke in a seaside bar. Not sure about Mauretania tho’ – I think I’m too old for adventure.

      Posted by venicelion | May 4, 2010, 19:57
  2. Wonderfully moving documentary. It’s a way of hearing the voice of those who cannot tell their story and raising awareness of the repercussions of international policies.

    Posted by Leonor | October 7, 2010, 03:10
    • I agree with your comment about hearing these voices, but it isn’t a documentary. I think that the theatrical presentation of the argument makes it more powerful than a documentary on the same issues.

      Posted by venicelion | October 7, 2010, 08:55
  3. I love this movie. I still can’t plug in what the stolen gun meant and why someone (who?) was shot at the end? Who had the gun? Who was shot? Why? what does it mean for Africa? I have been to Bamako many times and love the people, their music, and their culture very much.

    Posted by bonmom | October 13, 2011, 05:54
    • The ending of the film is indeed enigmatic. In one sense, does it matter who dies? Perhaps the point is that in too many parts of Africa there are guns circulating freely and casual killings might take place at any time? On the other hand we hear a shot over a blank screen and then see a man fall and a car come to a halt. The driver gets out and checks his tires. Was the shot aimed at the car – or was the explosion, the sound of a tyre bursting? Could the man who falls be the sick man from the courtyard? Bamako doesn’t have a conventional narrative, so perhaps we should ignore conventional narrative cues, but if we follow these the person on the street who falls is Chaka since we have just seen him put his child to bed. There is irony here since earlier his wife Melé refused to talk to the man who was investigating the missing gun. (Sight and Sound magazine suggests that the failing marriage between Melé and Chaka is a metaphor for the failed relationship between the West and Africa. So the West could be seen as ‘failing’ in its role and allowing/encouraging the death of Africans through the arms trade?) I wasn’t sure whether it is Melé who we see being helped out of the house before the funeral cortege sets out.

      Bamako is a great film that makes you think.

      Posted by Roy Stafford | October 20, 2011, 13:13

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow itpworld on Twitter

Categories

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 330 other followers

Archives

%d bloggers like this: