you're reading...
Italian cinema, Melodrama, Romance

I Am Love (Io sono l’amore, Italy 2009)

Emma (Tilda Swinton) and Betta (Alba Rohrwacher) in I Am Love. Photo courtesy Magnolia Pictures

I went to see this with few preconceptions. All I knew was that it starred Tilda Swinton – who was playing a Russian in an Italian film. There were just three of us in a 300+ seat cinema at teatime during the World Cup.

What a stupendous melodrama! I’m so glad I made the effort. Following the equally wonderful Vincere, I’m very aware of how much I’ve missed the ‘excess’ of Italian Cinema. The print I saw seemed a little ‘soft’ – which may have been the projection – but I was bowled over by the cinematography, production design, the typography of the titles, the costumes and the music – by American opera composer John Adams. The performances were terrific and in all this was melodrama par excellence.

Plot outline (no spoilers)

Tilda Swinton is ‘Emma’ – a name she adopted when she married into the Italian haute bourgeoisie from her Russian background. She was ‘collected’, rather like a work of art, by the textile industrialist Tancredi Recchi. Now Emma is the matriarch of an Italian family with three grown-up children. When the head of the family business retires he leaves the company, jointly to his son, Tancredi and, more controversially to his grandson Eduardo. The significant ‘stranger’ who then moves ‘into’ the family is not so much Eva, Eduardo’s fiancée, but Antonio, a young chef who becomes first Eduardo’s friend and then his putative partner in a restaurant business. Antonio also meets Emma – with explosive results.

Commentary

There is a lot to say about writer/director Luca Guadagnino‘s film, but perhaps the most important observation is that this is the kind of film that really divides audiences. I think it’s very sad but so few commentators seem able to watch a film and judge it on its merits. So the divide here is the all too familiar one of mainstream v. art and drama v. melodrama. If you don’t like traditional melodrama – that is, ‘excess’ on screen and on the soundtrack to express emotions that can’t be ‘spoken’ – you’ll probably hate the film and find it silly. This is the reaction of many IMDB users (though to be fair, they are matched by a similar number of swooners). You will probably also find the sex scenes laughable – I was surprised by my reaction to them in that I found them intensely erotic.

The obvious reference point for many aspects of the film is the work of Luchino Visconti. The family of industrialists who work under fascism as easily as democracy and always to preserve the business is from The Damned. The lust which overcomes Emma is there in Ossessione and in a more genteel way in Senso. The aristo/haute bourgeois family who give lavish parties whilst trying to evolve under late capitalism is from The Leopard. I was trying to think of Milanese movies, but the only one that popped into my head was de Sica’s Garden of the Finzi-Continis and that isn’t really appropriate. More appropriate as a similar setting is the recent French film, A Christmas Tale. Others have mentioned Antonioni. The film is strong in terms of feel and atmosphere but weak perhaps in narrative development. I think that the reason some audiences lose patience is that the conventional story ideas are not developed. For instance, Eduardo projects a kind of nostalgia for a family firm that looks after its employees and strives for ethical policies. He seems to have brushed over some of the family’s previous business decisions and his father is ruthless and ‘modern’ – yet this distinction isn’t really developed. Similarly, his sister Betta also defies the assumptions about how she may behave – allying herself in some ways with Eduardo. Her other brother is a nondescript character in the background (passed over by his grandfather). The potentially interesting story here is pushed aside in favour of the amour fou between Emma and Antonio.

The two other aspects of the film which will no doubt puzzle mainstream audiences, but perhaps help create a cultish following for the film, are first, Emma’s fleeting memories of Russian streets and an almost Hitchcockian sense of a potential romantic thriller emerging at certain points. Vertigo has been mentioned by some critics. I certainly got a frisson of this when Emma, stopping in Sanremo on her way to Nice, notices a Russian Orthodox church – and then Antonio. (Sanremo was an important resort for the Russian aristocracy before 1917.) I was vaguely reminded of Vertigo and other Hitchcock films at this point. The second aspect which might puzzle audiences is the use of very sudden and almost brutal edits at various points and then the use of short sequences outside the linear narrative so that we cannot be sure who knows what and whether something will be discovered. So, if you want a conventional story in which puzzles can be solved with clues and a satisfactory conclusion reached, you won’t find it here. But if you want to swoon in sensual delight and perhaps experience what it feels like to be madly in love – disorientating as well as exhilarating – this could be the movie for you.

The Recchi family

Tilda Swinton is properly the centre of the film and she looks fabulous. It helps that she is tall and slender and can wear beautiful but simple clothes – but that she can also do devastated and bedraggled with equal conviction.

One final point – have your dinner date sorted out for after the screening as you may be hungry.

Discussion

7 thoughts on “I Am Love (Io sono l’amore, Italy 2009)

  1. I love melodrama but I did not enjoy this film. For a film about passion it seemed remarkably lacking in passion.
    I gather the director worked in advertising. I thought of A Single Man and The Hours, both films that have beautiful but empty facades.
    The comparison with Visconti’s The Damned is apt. I found that film managed to show the ‘good taste’ of the bourgeoisie without making the settings feel insipid.
    I also thought that, rather like The Conformist, the film rather privileges style over substance, which given the references to fascism, is a little worrying.
    I longed for Michel Simon’s Boudu to wander in and disrupt proceedings.

    Posted by keith1942 | June 19, 2010, 14:26
  2. Many critics pointed to the influence of Douglas Sirk on the film’s melodramatic plot, but what intrigued me the most was the way the film presented a stylistic conflict between the orderliness of the Recchi household and the relative disorder (and commensurate excitement for Emma) of the outside world. The stately but rather lifeless mise en scene chez Recchi is in direct contrast with the bustling streets of Sanremo; elsewhere, the meal Antonio cooks for her reawakens her sensuality which has been dulled by lifeless food of the kind eaten earlier at the family’s dinner table. As in Sirk’s films – expressionistic in their use of over-saturated colours and lush scoring – Luca Guadagnino’s film aims not for realism but to the creation of an artifice designed to stimulate the senses, raising what is narratively a straightforward old-fashioned “woman’s picture” to an aesthete’s delight.

    Posted by Bags | June 19, 2010, 18:12
    • Yes, I agree. I didn’t mention Sirk only because I wanted to stay largely within the confines of the European bourgeoisie in making comparisons I’d have to think about whether the earlier European films of Sirk and Ophuls had similar elements. Your reference to the bustling streets of Sanremo is interesting, but what about the Milanese locations? The issue about the ‘woman’s picture’ is that I’m not sure that this generic classification is apparent until some way into the film. In the first twenty minutes (when I was enjoying the excess of the presentation of the cityscape and the mise en scene chez Recchi) I thought that I was watching a family melodrama in which the battle for control over the business was going to be more prominent.

      Posted by venicelion | June 19, 2010, 20:08
  3. I just adore Tilda Swinton, but I haven’t heard of this movie. I’ll have to check it out.

    Posted by Sexy Mexican Women | June 27, 2010, 01:38
  4. I think this is one of the best films I’ve ever seen. I thought the way the director made you feel claustrophobic in that huge Milanese house was masterful.

    Posted by suffchick | July 6, 2010, 22:24
  5. Wow- an intensely sensual film, beautiful cinematography and terrific characterisations. And yes, quite erotic too…

    Posted by Bosco | August 4, 2010, 11:32
  6. I think Sirk movies offer some distance for the audience but also offer some emotional involvement. I found I Am Love completely detached, hence my problem with it.
    And I did find it seemingly in love with the decor and settings rather than with any characters.
    The whole setting is bourgeois. Even the ‘lower-class’ lover figure is petit-bourgeois.

    Posted by keith1942 | August 13, 2010, 11:31

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow itpworld on Twitter

Categories

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 318 other followers

Archives

%d bloggers like this: